翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Number Cruncher Politics
・ Number density
・ Number Eight
・ Number Eight (Battlestar Galactica)
・ Number Engaged
・ Number Five
・ Number Five (album)
・ Number Five Crossbar Switching System
・ Number form
・ Number Forms
・ Number Four
・ Number Four (Battlestar Galactica)
・ Number Girl
・ Number line
・ Number matching
Number needed to harm
・ Number needed to treat
・ Number needed to vaccinate
・ Number nine
・ Number Nine (album)
・ Number Nine Research Laboratory
・ Number Nine Visual Technology
・ Number Nine, Arkansas
・ Number Nineteen
・ Number of deaths in Buchenwald
・ Number of guns per capita by country
・ Number of Identified Specimens
・ Number of the Beast
・ Number of the Beast (comics)
・ Number of the Beast (disambiguation)


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Number needed to harm : ウィキペディア英語版
Number needed to harm

The number needed to harm (NNH) is an epidemiological measure that indicates how many patients on average need to be exposed to a risk-factor over a specific period to cause harm in an average of one patient who would not otherwise have been harmed.〔(Glossary of Terms )〕 It is defined as the inverse of the attributable risk. Intuitively, the lower the number needed to harm, the worse the risk-factor, with 1 meaning that, on average, every patient exposed is harmed.
NNH is similar to Number needed to treat (NNT), where NNT usually refers to a therapeutic intervention and NNH to a detrimental effect or risk factor. NNH is computed with respect to "exposure" and "non-exposure", and can be determined for raw data or for data corrected for confounders. A defined endpoint has to be specified. If the probabilities ''pexposure'' and ''pnon-exposure'' of this endpoint are known, then the NNH is computed as 1/(''pexposure''-''pnon-exposure'').
The NNH is an important measure in evidence-based medicine and helps physicians decide whether it is prudent to proceed with a particular treatment which may expose the patient to harms while providing therapeutic benefits. If a clinical endpoint is devastating enough without the drug (e.g. death, heart attack), drugs with a low NNH may still be indicated in particular situations if the number needed to treat, (the converse for side effects, or the drug's benefit) is less than the NNH. However, there are several important problems with the NNH, involving bias and lack of reliable confidence intervals, as well as difficulties in excluding the possibility of no difference between two treatments or groups.
==Worked example==
The following is an example of calculating number needed to harm.
In a cohort study, individuals with exposure to a risk factor (Exposure +) are followed for a certain number of years to see if they develop a certain disease or outcome (Disease +). A control group of individuals who are not exposed to the risk factor (Exposure −) are also followed . "Follow up time" is the number of individuals in each group multiplied by the number of years that each individual is followed:
^ "Years followed" is a weighted average of the length of time the patients were followed.
The incidence with exposure is:
:\frac = 0.0701
The incidence without exposure:
:\frac = 0.0620
To determine the relative risk, divide the incidence with exposure by the incidence without exposure:
: \frac= 1.13 = = 121 = Number needed to harm
This means that if 121 individuals are exposed to the risk factor, 1 will develop the disease who would not have otherwise.
Note that these calculations can be affected enormously by roundoff error. (If no roundoff is used in the intermediate calculations above, the final figure for the NNH is 123.)

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Number needed to harm」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.